
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中山大学 电子与信息工程学院,广州 510275
2.中山大学 广东省光电信息处理芯片与系统重点实验室,广州 510275
王玮(1996-),女,浙江诸暨人。硕士,主要研究方向为短距离光互连。
李凡,副教授。E-mail:lifan39@mail.sysu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2023-10-10,
收稿日期:2022-09-02,
修回日期:2022-10-18,
扫 描 看 全 文
王玮,李凡,李朝晖.单边带直接检测系统中的SSBI损伤消除技术[J].光通信研究,2023(5):5-15.
Wang W, Li F, Li Z H.SSBI Elimination Technology in Single Sideband Direct Detection System[J].Study on Optical Communications, 2023(5):5-15.
王玮,李凡,李朝晖.单边带直接检测系统中的SSBI损伤消除技术[J].光通信研究,2023(5):5-15. DOI: 10.13756/j.gtxyj.2023.05.002.
Wang W, Li F, Li Z H.SSBI Elimination Technology in Single Sideband Direct Detection System[J].Study on Optical Communications, 2023(5):5-15. DOI: 10.13756/j.gtxyj.2023.05.002.
单边带(SSB)直接检测系统由于其低成本、简单的系统架构以及对色散的高鲁棒性,是解决80 km数据中心光互连(DCI)极具吸引力的方案。然而,信号间拍频干扰(SSBI)将是SSB直接检测系统中面临的主要问题。为了解决SSB直接检测系统中的SSBI损伤问题,文章分别对基于同相/正交(IQ)调制器和双臂马赫曾德尔调制器(DDMZM)的SSB直接检测系统展开研究。针对这两种SSB直接检测系统,分别提出了一种基于时域迭代的SSB信号重构算法和基于DDMZM的无SSBI直接检测方案。通过对算法实现原理的阐述以及仿真与实验系统的搭建,并结合仿真和实验结果,探讨了这两种方案在SSBI损伤消除方面的有效性和可行性。
Single Side Band (SSB) direct detection system is considered as an attractive solution for 80 km Data Center Interconnects (DCI)
due to its characteristics of low-cost
simple system architecture
and high robustness to chromatic dispersion. However
Signal to Signal Beating Interference (SSBI) is the major problem in SSB direct detection system. In order to address the SSBI in the SSB direct detection systems
the SSB modulation realized by IQ modulator and Dual Drive Mach Zehnder Modulator (DDMZM) is investigated. A SSB signal reconstruction algorithm based on time domain iteration and an SSBI-free direct detection scheme based on DDMZM are proposed respectively for these two SSB direct detection systems. The implementation principle and simulation or experimental setup are introduced in detail. According to the simulation and experimental results
the effectiveness and feasibility of the two schemes in SSBI elimination are discussed.
数据中心光互连单边带直接检测信号间拍频干扰单边带信号重构
DCISSB direct detectionSSBISSB signal reconstruction
Zhong K P, Zhou X, Huo J H, et al. Digital Signal Processing for Short-reach Optical Communications: A Review of Current Technologies and Future Trends[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2018, 36(2): 377-400.
Zhong K. Experimental Demonstration of 500 Gbit/s Short Reach Transmission Employing PAM4 Signal and Direct Detection with 25 Gbps Device[C]//2015 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC). Los Angeles, CA, USA: IEEE, 2015: Th3A.3.
Nikolaos-Panteleimon D, Wataru K, Hidetaka N, et al. Amplifierless PAM-4/PAM-8 Transmissions in O-band Using a Directly Modulated Laser for Optical Data-center Interconnects[J]. Optics Letters, 2019, 44(1): 9-12.
IEEE 802.3bs-2017, IEEE Standard for Ethernet Amendment 10: Media Access Control Parameters, Physical Layers, and Management Parameters for 200 Gb/s and 400 Gb/s Operation[S].
Li F, Zou D D, Sui Q, et al. Optical Amplifier Free 100 Gbit/s/Lamda PAM-W Transmission and Reception in O Band over 40 km SMF with 10 G Class DML[C]//Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibition. San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE, 2019: Tu2F.4.
冯楠, 鞠诚, 连彬. 中短距直接检测光传输系统调制及均衡技术综述[J]. 光通信研究, 2021(6): 1-12.
Feng N, Ju C, Lian B. Advanced Modulation and Equalization Schemes for Optical Short to Medium Reach DD Link[J]. Study on Optical Communications, 2021(6): 1-12.
Zou D D, Li F, Li Z B, et al. 100 G PAM6 and PAM8 Signal Transmission Enabled by Pre-chirping for 10 km Intra-DCI Utilizing MZM in C Band[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2020, 38(13): 3445-3453.
Devaux F, Sorel Y, Kerdiles J F. Simple Measurement of Fiber Dispersion and of Chirp Parameter of Intensity Modulated Light Emitter[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 1993, 11(12): 1937-1940.
Kaneda N, Lee J, Chen Y K. Nonlinear Equalizer for 112 Gb/s SSB-PAM4 in 80 km Dispersion Uncompensated Link[C]//Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibition. Los Angeles, CA, USA: IEEE, 2017: Tu2D.5.
Zhu M Y, Zhang J, Yi X, et al. Hilbert Superposition and Modified Signal-to-signal Beating Interference Cancellation for Single Side-band Optical NPAM-4 Direct-detection System[J]. Optics Express, 2017, 25(11): 12622-12631.
Chen H Y, Kaneda N, Lee J, et al. Optical Filter Requirements in an EML-based Single-sideband PAM4 Intensity-modulation and Direct-detection Transmission System[J]. Optics Express, 2017, 25(6): 5852-5860.
Le S T, Schuh K, Chagnon M, et al. 1.72-Tb/s Virtual-carrier-assisted Direct-detection Transmission Over 200 km[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2018, 36(6): 1347-1353.
Zhu M Y, Zhang J, Yi X, et al. Optical Single Side-band Nyquist PAM-4 Transmission Using Dual-drive MZM Modulation and Direct Detection[J]. Optics Express, 2018, 26(6): 6629-6638.
Bo T W, Kim H. Generalized Model of Optical Single Sideband Generation Using Dual Modulation of DML and EAM[J]. Optics Express, 2020, 28(19): 28491-28501.
Peng W R, Wu X X, Feng K M, et al. Spectrally Efficient Direct-detected OFDM Transmission Employing an Iterative Estimation and Cancellation Technique[J]. Optics Express, 2009, 17(11): 9099-9111.
Randel S, Pilori D, Chandrasekhar S, et al. 100-Gb/s Discrete-multitone Transmission over 80 km SSMF Using Single-sideband Modulation with Novel Interference-cancellation Scheme[C]//2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC). Valencia, Spain: IEEE, 2015: 7341665.
Zou K H, Zhu Y X, Zhang F, et al. 1.2 Tb/s (12×100 Gb/s) Nyquist 32-QAM Subcarrier Modulation WDM Transmission with Direct Detection[C]//Asia Communications and Photonics Conference. Hong Kong, China: OSA, 2015: AM4A.4.
Mecozzi A, Antonelli C, Shtaif M. Kramers-kronig Coherent Receiver[J]. Optica, 2016, 3(11): 1220-1227.
Bo T, Kim H. Kramers-kronig Receiver Operable without Digital Upsampling[C]//2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC). San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, 2018: 17856137.
Patel R K, Alimi I A, Muga N J, et al. Optical Signal Phase Retrieval with Low Complexity DC-value Method[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2020, 38(16): 4205-4212.
Ishimura S, Kao H, Yanaka K, et al. SSBI-free Direct-fetection System Employing Phase Modulation for Analog Optical Links[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2020, 38(9): 2719-2725.
Peng W R, Morita I, Tanaka H. Enabling High Capacity Direct-detection Optical OFDM Transmissions Using Beat Interference Cancellation Receiver[C]//36th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication. Turin, Italy: IEEE, 2010: 5621488.
An S H, Zhu Q M, Li J C, et al. Modified KK Receiver with Accurate Field Reconstruction at Low CSPR Condition[C]//2019 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC). San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE, 2019: M1H.3.
Li Z, Erkilinç M S, Maher R, et al. Two-stage Linearization Filter for Direct-detection Subcarrier Modulation[J]. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2016, 28(24): 2838-2841.
Li Z, Erkilinç M S, Pachnicke S, et al. Direct-detection 16-QAM Nyquist-shaped Subcarrier Modulation with SSBI Mitigation[C]//2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). London, UK: IEEE, 2015: 7249150.
Ju C, Liu N, Chen X, et al. SSBI Mitigation in a RF-tone-based VSSB-OFDM System with a Frequencydomain Volterra Series Equalizer[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2015, 33(23): 4997-5006.
Li Z, Erkılınç M S, Shi K, et al. Spectrally Efficient 168 Gb/s/λ WDM 64-QAM Single-sideband Nyquist-subcarrier Modulation with Kramers–kronig Direct-detection Receivers[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2018, 36(6): 1340-1346.
Lu D X, Zhou X, Hou J H, et al. Theoretical CSPR Analysis and Performance Comparison for Four Single-sideband Modulation Schemes with Kramers-kronig Receiver[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 166257-166267.
Erkılınç M S, Li Z, Pachnicke S, et al. Spectrally Efficient WDM Nyquist Pulse-shaped 16-QAM Subcarrier Modulation Transmission with Direct Detection[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2015, 33(15): 3147-3155.
Zhu Y X, Zou K H, Chen Z Y, et al. 224 Gb/s Optical Carrier-assisted Nyquist 16-QAM Half-cycle Single-sideband Direct Detection Transmission over 160 km SSMF[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2017, 35(9): 1557-1565.
Chen X, Antonelli C, Chandrasekhar S, et al. Kramers-kronig Receivers for 100 km Datacenter Interconnects[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2018, 36(1): 79-89.
Antonelli C, Mecozzi A, Shtaif M, et al. Polarization Multiplexing with the Kramers-kronig Receiver[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2017, 35(24): 5418-5424.
Li Z, Erkılınç M S, Shi K, et al. SSBI Mitigation and the Kramers–kronig Scheme in Single-sideband Direct-detection Transmission with Receiver-based Electronic Dispersion Compensation[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2017, 35(10): 1887-1893.
Sun C, Che D, Shieh W. Comparison of Chromatic Dispersion Sensitivity between Kramers–kronig and SSBI Iterative Cancellation Receiver[C]//2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC). San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, 2018: W4E.4.
Schmidt B J C, Zan Z, Du L B, et al. 120 Gbit/s over 500-km Using Single-band Polarization-multiplexed Self-coherent Optical OFDM[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2010, 28(4): 328-335.
Füllner C, Wolf S, Kemal J N, et al. Transmission of 80 GBd 16-QAM over 300 km and Kramers-kronig Reception Using a Low-complexity FIR Hilbert Filter Approximation[C]//2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC). San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, 2018: W4E.3.
Bo T W, Kim H. Towards Practical Kramers-kronig Receiver: Resampling, Performance, and Implementation [J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2019, 37(2): 461-469.
Zhang L, Zuo T J, Mao Y, et al. Beyond 100-Gb/s Transmission over 80 km SMF Using Direct-detection SSB-DMT at C-band[J]. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2016, 34(2): 723-729.
0
浏览量
12
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
鄂公网安备 42011202002092号